KQV AM 1410

KQV Editorial

The Mayor’s 2010 Budget-Time to Trim the Hog Fat!

Download Audio


     To paraphrase an old axiom – Mayor Ravenstahl proposes and the state overseer committee disposes.

     We’re referring, of course, to the mayor’s proposed budget for 2010 and its rejection by the Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority.  The I.C.A. is involved because of the city’s long troubled finances.  The budget also needs the approval of city council and city controller.

     In rejecting the mayor’s proposed budget of $454.8 million, the I.C.A. is questioning his unproven one percent tuition tax which the mayor says would provide $16 million to fill a gap in the budget.

     The proposed tuition tax would be leveled on students at institutions of higher learning and trade schools.  Needless to say, it has created a wave of opposition from colleges and universities and students alike.

     The mayor’s budget was vetoed by the I.C.A. which pointed out that the controversial one percent tuition tax violated state law which specifies that cities are not permitted to impose taxes without state legislature approval.

     Leaders of colleges and universities complain that the tax is illegal, unfair, unwise, and unenforceable…and their students feel they are unjustly being taxed.

     The mayor, in defense of his position, states that these institutions and their students benefit from all the services provided by the city and they should pay their fair share.

     The educational institutions at the college and university levels are tax exempt and they feel that the proposed post-secondary education privilege tax encroaches on the benefits they receive from their tax status.

     It should be pointed out that there are 96,000 students who would be affected by the tuition tax.

     In advancing his position, the mayor states that these institutions of higher learning continue to raise tuition and student fees and have no right to complain about the one percent tax.

     In its veto, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority comes down hard on the tuition tax and says there are other ways of attaining the $16 million involved, including cutting  out the pork in the city’s activities.

     We have long opposed the one percent tuition tax over and above its being illegal.  In our opinion, it’s also very shortsighted and self-defeating.  So don’t threaten us with service cuts, Mr. Mayor and instead, cut out the pork.  After all, it’s you and your Grant Street cronies who helped get us into this fiscal mess in the first place!



Robert W. Dickey


KQV Newsradio
November 20, 21, 22, 2009                                   

Submit Your Feedback

Opinion Poll

KQV/TribLIVE.COM Listener Poll
Who do you have more confidence in fixing the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority? <More Info>

City of Pittsburgh
State of Pennsylvania
State of Pennsylvania
City of Pittsburgh
Total Votes: 12,301

Yesterday's Poll

KQV/TribLIVE.COM Listener Poll
Do you agree that Pittsburgh is ready to emerge from Act 47 distressed status?

Total Votes: 8,730